From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24131 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2008 20:08:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24124 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2008 20:08:40 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:08:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m67K8FWL021011 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:08:15 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m67K8ERm002260; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:08:14 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-112.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.112]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m67K8Ew0008568; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:08:14 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B027A3781A0; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:08:13 -0600 (MDT) To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Andrew Cagney , frysk Subject: Re: C++ debugger mailing list References: <486E887B.9020707@redhat.com> <48726570.6060902@oracle.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <48726570.6060902@oracle.com> (Elena Zannoni's message of "Mon\, 07 Jul 2008 14\:50\:24 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact frysk-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Elena" == Elena Zannoni writes: Elena> Can somebody elaborate? Elena> We'd like to participate in these ongoing discussions for the new Elena> project, whatever that is. There's a discussion internally about various directional changes. Some of this is really Red Hat internal stuff; the stuff that isn't will all be re-discussed publicly in the near future. I'll try to get something out this week. Tom