From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Youngdale" To: hjl@nynexst.com (H.J. Lu), gas2@cygnus.com Cc: raeburn@cygnus.com (Ken Raeburn), ian@cygnus.com (Ian Lance Taylor), david@istwok.ods.com (David Engel), linux-gcc@vger.rutgers.edu (linuxgcc), bonn@eskimo.com (David Bonn), kjahds@kjahds.com (Kenneth Albanowski), lmfken@lmf.ericsson.se (Kenneth Osterberg), ian@lasermoon.co.uk, mat@ardi.com (Mat Hostetter), ecn@clark.net (Eric C. Newton), doughera@lafcol.lafayette.edu (Andy Dougherty), brian@mathworks.com (Brian Bourgault), jchristy@bga.com (John W. Christy), craig@metrolink.com (Craig Groeschel), imp@village.org (Warner Losh), robf@www.willows.com (Rob Farnum), Huw.Rogers@ska.com (Huw Rogers), meissner@cygnus.com (Michael Meissner) Subject: Re: DT_SYMBOLIC and -Bsymbolic Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 07:42:00 -0000 Message-id: <9506191041.ZM12711@aib.com> References: <9506191353.AA03701@titanic.nynexst.com> X-SW-Source: 1995/msg00112.html On Jun 19, 9:58am, H.J. Lu wrote: > Subject: DT_SYMBOLIC and -Bsymbolic > Hi, > > Do the current binutils snapshots and the Linux ELF dynamic > linker support DT_SYMBOLIC? It should be easy to add -Bsymbolic > to ld. The Linux ELF dynamic linker just needs to check the > presence of DT_SYMBOLIC in the shared library to control the > symbol binding. It is specified in the ELF doc, ELF.doc.tar.gz, > on tsx-11 and sunsite in the linux gcc directory I doubt that this is handled at all - I never added support for it, so unless Ian did it, there is probably nothing. The good news is that it would not be that hard to add. -Eric -- "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep, And lines to code before I sleep, And lines to code before I sleep."