* small patch for objdump
@ 1998-10-27 8:47 Philip Blundell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Philip Blundell @ 1998-10-27 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gas2
I just found this change in my tree. I made it some months ago to fix a
problem with addresses above 0x80000000 being reported incorrectly when
disassembling code. Although I haven't tested versions later than the 2.9.1
release it looks like the problem is still there; would someone like to
take a look? Thanks.
p.
1998-10-27 Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
* objdump.c (disassemble_bytes): Make address variables unsigned
to avoid problems when disassembling code at high-bit-set
addresses.
diff -u --recursive --exclude CVS --new-file clean/binutils-2.9.1.0.15/binutils/objdump.c binutils/binutils/objdump.c
--- clean/binutils-2.9.1.0.15/binutils/objdump.c Fri Apr 17 11:36:02 1998
+++ binutils/binutils/objdump.c Mon Aug 17 11:28:40 1998
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
static void
disassemble_bytes PARAMS ((struct disassemble_info *, disassembler_ftype,
- boolean, bfd_byte *, long, long, arelent ***,
+ boolean, bfd_byte *, unsigned long, unsigned long, arelent ***,
arelent **));
static void
@@ -1155,8 +1155,8 @@
disassembler_ftype disassemble_fn;
boolean insns;
bfd_byte *data;
- long start;
- long stop;
+ unsigned long start;
+ unsigned long stop;
arelent ***relppp;
arelent **relppend;
{
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@
int bytes_per_line;
boolean done_dot;
int skip_addr_chars;
- long i;
+ unsigned long i;
aux = (struct objdump_disasm_info *) info->application_data;
section = aux->sec;
@@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@
i = start;
while (i < stop)
{
- long z;
+ unsigned long z;
int bytes;
boolean need_nl = false;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: small patch for objdump
@ 1998-10-27 14:42 Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 1998-10-27 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pb; +Cc: gas2
: Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:46:12 +0100
: From: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
:
: I just found this change in my tree. I made it some months ago to fix a
: problem with addresses above 0x80000000 being reported incorrectly when
: disassembling code. Although I haven't tested versions later than the 2.9.1
: release it looks like the problem is still there; would someone like to
: take a look? Thanks.
:
: p.
:
: 1998-10-27 Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
:
: * objdump.c (disassemble_bytes): Make address variables unsigned
: to avoid problems when disassembling code at high-bit-set
: addresses.
I checked, and you are right, the code was still using signed
addresses. (Of course some processors do have signed address spaces,
but they are in the minority). So, I have applied your patch.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-10-27 14:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-10-27 8:47 small patch for objdump Philip Blundell
1998-10-27 14:42 Nick Clifton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).