From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Sherrill To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: gas2@cygnus.com Subject: Re: binutils 2.8.1 problem compiling gcc-2.8.0-971206 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 11:32:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <199712081920.OAA04767@subrogation.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1997/msg00041.html On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 13:08:19 -0600 (CST) > From: Joel Sherrill > > I have been wondering whether the egcs and gcc 2.8 releases imply binutils > and newlib should have releases as well. I know the as.new -> as-new > change is something which must be in sync for the one-tree build procedure > to work. > > Certainly there should be a binutils release. Unfortunately, it's a > question of available time to produce one. I'll try to start the > process soon. I understand completely. It is tough to get things to stabilize, find time to test, and hope that the releases of multiple interdependent packages happen close to one another. I am trying to get an RTEMS release out the door now. And gcc 2.8/egcs 1.0 are the first gcc releases with RTEMS support. --joel