From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-158854-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16885 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 18:53:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16836 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Sep 2005 18:53:24 -0000
Received: from mail-out2.fuse.net (HELO smtp2.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:53:24 +0000
Received: from gx5.fuse.net ([216.68.189.57]) by smtp2.fuse.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP
          id <20050919185322.UPHE16829.smtp2.fuse.net@gx5.fuse.net>;
          Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:53:22 -0400
Received: from dellpi.pinski.fam ([216.68.189.57]) by gx5.fuse.net
          (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP
          id <20050919185322.TMIS22043.gx5.fuse.net@dellpi.pinski.fam>;
          Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:53:22 -0400
Received: from [10.0.0.80] (zhivago.i.pinski.fam [10.0.0.80])
	by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id j8JIrIDk004743;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:53:18 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20050919182252.29453.qmail@sourceware.org>
References: <20050917194257.23929.marcus@jet.franken.de> <20050919182252.29453.qmail@sourceware.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <10088160bf6fd85ac656328ebcf1c8e1@physics.uc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: [Bug tree-optimization/23929] [4.1 Regression] segfault in expand_simple_operations, tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:637
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:53:00 -0000
To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02449.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


On Sep 19, 2005, at 2:22 PM, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>
> ------- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  
> 2005-09-19 18:22 -------
> A reghunt on powerpc-linux shows the segfault starts with this patch 
> from
> rguenth@gcc.gnu.org:

Then this is a latent bug as it does not touch any of the backtrace.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski