From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2474 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 21:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2467 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 21:24:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.co.uk) (213.152.55.49) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 21:24:01 -0000 Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18UCoM-0003ZI-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:23:30 +0000 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:24:00 -0000 From: Neil Booth To: Songtao Chen Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Is this a bug? Message-ID: <20030102212330.GA13686@daikokuya.co.uk> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 List-Id: Songtao Chen wrote:- > Hi there, > > It appears to be a bug to me. No, i++ returns the value before increment. Parentheses are irrelevant. Neil.