[Bug 1111] New: Order matters for inline candidates

[Bug 1111] New: Order matters for inline candidates

[gcc-bugzilla]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1111

           Summary: Order matters for inline candidates
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: NEW
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: aph@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: apbianco@cygnus.com
                CC: aph@gcc.gnu.org,dhazeghi@yahoo.com,gcc-
                    bugs@gcc.gnu.org,neroden@gcc.gnu.org,steven.bosscher@usa
                    fa.af.mil

Inline candidates have to be seen as such before being 
inlined when used.

Release:
Current

Environment:
All

How-To-Repeat:
Use an inline candidate before and after declaration. Notice
that the candidate's symbol still exists when the candidate
is declared after having been used.
------- Additional Comments From apbianco@cygnus.com  2000-20-12 12:06 -------
Fix:
Have inline candidates considered first (re-ordering the
list of methods in a class.)
------- Additional Comments From steven.bosscher@usafa.af.mil  2002-21-11 13:21 -------
From: Bosscher Steven Civ USAFA/DFAN <Steven.Bosscher@usafa.af.mil>
To: "'apbianco@gcc.gnu.org'" <apbianco@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'apbianco@cygnus.com'"<apbianco@cygnus.com>,
        "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'java-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:21:56 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=1111
 
 This is a pretty old PR, does the problem still occur with the new Java
 inliner?
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 

------- Additional Comments From neroden@gcc.gnu.org  2003-27-03 20:55 -------
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-Why: waitin' for feedback

------- Additional Comments From aph@gcc.gnu.org  2003-11-04 12:43 -------
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-Why: This requires some considerable reorganization of the front end to fix.  Maybe porting Java to tree-ssa will do the job.

------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-12-05 11:05 -------
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:05:58 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=1111
 
 Andrew Haley confirms that this bug is not fixed (20030512).
 


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-12-05 11:12 -------
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:12:13 -0700 (PDT)

 --- Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
 > From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
 > Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:08:45 +0100
 > To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
 > CC: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>,
 > <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
 > 	<java@gcc.gnu.org>
 > Subject: Re: Old Java PRs
 > 
 > Jeff Sturm writes:
 >  > On Mon, 12 May 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
 >  > >  > Unless I misunderstand this PR, it is fixed
 > by the new inliner (except for
 >  > >  > the bytecode frontend, which still does not
 > emit whole functions as
 >  > >  > trees).
 >  > >
 >  > > It isn't.  The new inliner still will not
 > inline functions until they
 >  > > have been expanded.
 >  > 
 >  > Unfortunately the PR doesn't include a test case.
 >  
 >  > 
 >  > So it looks as though you're right, though I
 > could swear I've seen this
 >  > work before.  My understanding of the tree
 > inliner is that it does not
 >  > require expanding the inlined bodies to RTL, but
 > I don't remember the
 >  > details.
 > 
 > Given that I wrote the inliner, I do.  :-)
 > 
 > The problem is that binding contours for variables
 > are generated when
 > the functions are expanded.
 > 
 > Andrew.
 > 
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.