* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
@ 2003-05-25 23:39 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-07-06 2:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-25 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
2003-05-25 23:39 ` [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-07-06 2:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-07-07 8:29 ` sjs at essex dot ac dot uk
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-07-06 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-07-06 02:55 -------
Sorry, I didn't seem to get your original e-mail. Anyhow, I've just checked with gcc 3.2.3, 3.3
branch, and mainline on i686-linux and can't reproduce this. Would it be at all possible for you to
check if gcc 3.3 also has this problem?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
2003-05-25 23:39 ` [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-07-06 2:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-07-07 8:29 ` sjs at essex dot ac dot uk
2003-08-27 9:24 ` dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: sjs at essex dot ac dot uk @ 2003-07-07 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
------- Additional Comments From sjs at essex dot ac dot uk 2003-07-07 08:29 -------
Subject: Re: gnatchop fails with
EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
At 03:55 06/07/2003, you wrote:
>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-07-06 02:55 -------
>Sorry, I didn't seem to get your original e-mail. Anyhow, I've just checked with gcc 3.2.3, 3.3
>branch, and mainline on i686-linux and can't reproduce this. Would it be at all possible for you to
>check if gcc 3.3 also has this problem?
I haven't yet got a copy of gcc 3.3. I am waiting for the mingw release, as I use Windows,
and I can't spare the time to build gcc from scratch.
As soon as Mingw gcc 3.3 is released I'll try it.
Steve.
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-07 8:29 ` sjs at essex dot ac dot uk
@ 2003-08-27 9:24 ` dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-27 10:27 ` dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-27 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-27 09:24 -------
With GNATCHOP 3.4 20030825 (experimental) on mingw32
I get:
D:\develop\bugs>gnatchop -w floating-point-fault.txt
splitting floating-point-fault.txt into:
rgb_conversion_test.adb
creake.ads
creake-pixel_types.ads
creake-pixel_types-composite_types.ads
creake-pixel_types-composite_types-rgb_conversions.ads
creake-pixel_types-composite_types-rgb_conversions.adb
I'll test with 3.3.1 build as soon as find the right CD.
Danny
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-27 9:24 ` dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-27 10:27 ` dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-11 16:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:40 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-27 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-27 10:27 -------
And with GNATCHOP 3.3.1 (mingw special 20030804-1)
I get:
D:\develop\bugs>gnatchop -w floating-point-fault.txt
splitting floating-point-fault.txt into:
rgb_conversion_test.adb
creake.ads
creake-pixel_types.ads
creake-pixel_types-composite_types.ads
creake-pixel_types-composite_types-rgb_conversions.ads
creake-pixel_types-composite_types-rgb_conversions.adb
NB, building of Ada and Gnatchop for mingw32 requires patches which have
have not been reviewed. These have been submitted to ACT and have been
published in this forum. The patchset is also available from www.mingw.org
download page.
Danny
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-27 10:27 ` dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-11 16:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-09 17:40 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-11 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-11 16:29 -------
Closing as Danny says this is fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug ada/8924] gnatchop fails with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
[not found] <20021213050602.8924.sjs@essex.ac.uk>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-11 16:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-09 17:40 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-12-09 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |3.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread