public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> @ 2003-06-02 2:26 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-03 13:03 ` nickc@redhat.com ` (7 subsequent siblings) 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-02 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nickc@redhat.com GCC build triplet| |i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet| |i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet| |v850-elf ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-02 02:26 ------- Nick, would you mind having a brief look at this bug report? It seems to be a pretty old one which may no longer even be present, but it also includes a patch... Thanks, Dara ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> 2003-06-02 2:26 ` [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-03 13:03 ` nickc@redhat.com 2003-06-03 17:22 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com ` (6 subsequent siblings) 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: nickc@redhat.com @ 2003-06-03 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 ------- Additional Comments From nickc@redhat.com 2003-06-03 13:03 ------- Subject: Re: [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments Hi Dara, > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 > Nick, > > would you mind having a brief look at this bug report? It seems to > be a pretty old one which may no longer even be present, but it also > includes a patch... Thanks, Unfortunately the v850 port does not even build at the moment, so I cannot test the patch. Once I have fixed the build problems I will have a look at it though, OK ? Cheers Nick ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> 2003-06-02 2:26 ` [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-03 13:03 ` nickc@redhat.com @ 2003-06-03 17:22 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-04 10:05 ` markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com ` (5 subsequent siblings) 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-03 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-03 17:22 ------- Thanks, sounds good... I'll leave it in WAITING in case the submitter can confirm it's fixed on previous versions. Dara ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2003-06-03 17:22 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-04 10:05 ` markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com 2003-06-04 10:58 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com ` (4 subsequent siblings) 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com @ 2003-06-04 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 ------- Additional Comments From markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com 2003-06-04 10:04 ------- Thank you. I have just been able to try with 3.1.1., and as far as I understand it seems to be O.K. Regards, Markku *************************************************** #include <stdarg.h> extern int out ( int ); void test( int parc, ... ) { va_list list; va_start( list, parc ); while( parc ) { int i; i = va_arg( list, int ); out( i ); parc --; } va_end( list ); } int main( void ) { test( 4, 1, 2, 3, 4 ); return 0; } ************************************************************ .file "va_arg.c" gcc2_compiled.: .section .text .align 1 .global _test .type _test,@function _test: st.w r6,0[sp] st.w r7,4[sp] st.w r8,8[sp] st.w r9,12[sp] addi -36,sp,sp st.w r31,32[sp] st.w r28,28[sp] st.w r29,24[sp] mov sp,r29 st.w r6,36[r29] addi 40,r29,r10 st.w r10,20[r29] .L3: ld.w 36[r29],r10 cmp r0,r10 bne .L5 br .L4 .L5: ld.w 20[r29],r28 ld.w 20[r29],r10 addi 4,r10,r11 st.w r11,20[r29] ld.w 0[r28],r10 st.w r10,16[r29] ld.w 16[r29],r6 jarl _out,r31 ld.w 36[r29],r10 addi -1,r10,r11 st.w r11,36[r29] br .L3 .L4: .L2: mov r29,sp ld.w 32[sp],r31 ld.w 28[sp],r28 ld.w 24[sp],r29 addi 36,sp,sp jmp [r31] .Lfe1: .size _test,.Lfe1-_test .align 1 .global _main .type _main,@function _main: addi -28,sp,sp st.w r31,24[sp] st.w r29,20[sp] mov sp,r29 mov 4,r10 st.w r10,16[sp] mov 4,r6 mov 1,r7 mov 2,r8 mov 3,r9 jarl _test,r31 mov 0,r10 br .L6 .L6: mov r29,sp ld.w 24[sp],r31 ld.w 20[sp],r29 addi 28,sp,sp jmp [r31] .Lfe2: .size _main,.Lfe2-_main .ident "GCC: (GNU) 2.96-xscale-010827" *********************************************************** .file "va_arg.c" .section .text .align 1 .global _test .type _test,@function _test: st.w r6,0[sp] st.w r7,4[sp] st.w r8,8[sp] st.w r9,12[sp] addi -32,sp,sp st.w r31,28[sp] st.w r29,24[sp] mov sp,r29 st.w r6,32[r29] addi 36,r29,r10 st.w r10,20[r29] .L2: ld.w 32[r29],r10 cmp r0,r10 bne .L4 br .L1 .L4: ld.w 20[r29],r11 addi 4,r11,r10 st.w r10,20[r29] ld.w 0[r11],r10 st.w r10,16[r29] ld.w 16[r29],r6 jarl _out,r31 ld.w 32[r29],r10 add -1,r10 st.w r10,32[r29] br .L2 .L1: mov r29,sp ld.w 28[sp],r31 ld.w 24[sp],r29 addi 32,sp,sp jmp [r31] .Lfe1: .size _test,.Lfe1-_test .align 1 .global _main .type _main,@function _main: addi -28,sp,sp st.w r31,24[sp] st.w r29,20[sp] mov sp,r29 mov 4,r10 st.w r10,16[sp] mov 4,r6 mov 1,r7 mov 2,r8 mov 3,r9 jarl _test,r31 mov 0,r10 mov r29,sp ld.w 24[sp],r31 ld.w 20[sp],r29 addi 28,sp,sp jmp [r31] .Lfe2: .size _main,.Lfe2-_main .ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.1.1" ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2003-06-04 10:05 ` markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com @ 2003-06-04 10:58 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-27 3:25 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu ` (3 subsequent siblings) 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-04 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-04 10:58 ------- Thanks for the feedback. I think we should leave this open until v850 bootstraps, and Nick can make certain the problem is fixed. Thanks, Dara P.S. Nick, if you disagree, feel free to close this report. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2003-06-04 10:58 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-27 3:25 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-11 18:49 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-06-27 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-27 03:25:33 date| | ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-06-27 03:25 ------- v850 does not build now but the patch does fix the problem in 3.1.1 si I am changing this to new. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2003-06-27 3:25 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-11 18:49 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-08-12 13:32 ` nickc at redhat dot com 2003-08-12 13:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-08-11 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com | GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-08-11 18:49 ------- Now that v850-elf builds again, it looks like 3.4 produces identical asm to 3.1.1 for this testcase. Nick, does this mean this problem is fixed? Thanks, Dara ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2003-08-11 18:49 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-08-12 13:32 ` nickc at redhat dot com 2003-08-12 13:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: nickc at redhat dot com @ 2003-08-12 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2003-08-12 13:32 ------- Subject: Re: [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments Hi Dara, > Now that v850-elf builds again, it looks like 3.4 produces identical > asm to 3.1.1 for this testcase. Nick, does this mean this problem > is fixed? Yes - this one can be closed. Cheers Nick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments [not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2003-08-12 13:32 ` nickc at redhat dot com @ 2003-08-12 13:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-12 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |3.4 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-12 13:35 ------- Closing as this is fixed on the mainline. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-12 13:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com>
2003-06-02 2:26 ` [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-03 13:03 ` nickc@redhat.com
2003-06-03 17:22 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-04 10:05 ` markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com
2003-06-04 10:58 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-27 3:25 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-11 18:49 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-08-12 13:32 ` nickc at redhat dot com
2003-08-12 13:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).