* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
@ 2003-06-02 4:06 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-02 4:34 ` gdr@integrable-solutions.net
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-02 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gdr@integrable-solutions.net
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-02 04:06 -------
Gabriel,
apologies if you're receiving this message twice (wasn't sure if the other address in the bug report
worked). Can you give us an update on the status of this bug please? Thanks,
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
2003-06-02 4:06 ` [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-06-02 4:34 ` gdr@integrable-solutions.net
2003-06-03 16:14 ` giovannibajo@libero.it
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gdr@integrable-solutions.net @ 2003-06-02 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
------- Additional Comments From gdr@integrable-solutions.net 2003-06-02 04:34 -------
Subject: Re: Built-in functions not marked as such
"dhazeghi@yahoo.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Gabriel,
|
| apologies if you're receiving this message twice (wasn't sure if the
| other address in the bug report
| worked). Can you give us an update on the status of this bug please?
| Thanks,
I think this may have been fixed by Roger Sayle's patch on
2003-02-25.
-- Gaby
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
2003-06-02 4:06 ` [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-02 4:34 ` gdr@integrable-solutions.net
@ 2003-06-03 16:14 ` giovannibajo@libero.it
2003-07-10 13:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo@libero.it @ 2003-06-03 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo@libero.it 2003-06-03 16:14 -------
Gaby, I think the problem is that we don't have a clue of what you mean
with "built-in functions are not marked as such". If you could please verify
yourself if Roger's patch fixed this, or at least explain us what we should
check (code snippet, or whatever), that would be great. Thanks.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 16:14 ` giovannibajo@libero.it
@ 2003-07-10 13:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-10 13:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-10 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10 13:00 -------
maybe this one should just be closed because nobody except the reporter has a
clue of what this is about. Gabriel, can you throw us a bone here, or I'll just
close it as INVALID (because of the lack of a proper problem
description/how-to-repeat guide).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-10 13:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-10 13:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-08-20 21:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2003-07-10 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-07-10 13:11 -------
Subject: Re: Built-in functions not marked as such
"steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
|
| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
|
|
|
| ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10 13:00 -------
| maybe this one should just be closed because nobody except the reporter has a
| clue of what this is about. Gabriel, can you throw us a bone here, or I'll just
| close it as INVALID (because of the lack of a proper problem
| description/how-to-repeat guide).
Please don't close this yet. I'll give you more bits.
-- Gaby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-10 13:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2003-08-20 21:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-14 8:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-20 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-20 21:22 -------
Gabriel Dos Reis you know it has been one month since you said you will give more information
(Note I do not think anyone is going to close this any time soon).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-20 21:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-14 8:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-11-14 8:27 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-11-14 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-11-14 08:26 -------
Closing so as to mark this one....
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-14 8:26 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-11-14 8:27 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-12-18 18:05 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-11-14 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-11-14 08:27 -------
unconfirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-14 8:27 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-12-18 18:05 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2005-06-12 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-12 23:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-12-18 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-12-18 17:41 -------
Gaby, it'd be great if you could have a look at this? Is this bug still present?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-18 18:05 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2005-06-12 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-12 23:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-12 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 23:23 -------
Any news on this because nobody understand this bug except for the reporter.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such
[not found] <20020813094601.7588.gdr@nerim.net>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-12 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-12 23:35 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-06-12 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-12 23:35 -------
Subject: Re: Built-in functions not marked as such
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Any news on this because nobody understand this bug except for the reporter.
The reporter knew what was happening.
Roger had worked in this area and fixed the built-ins at fault. This
bug was observed through the debug information output
-fdump-translation-unit.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread