* [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
[not found] <20020904185600.7831.cvansch@cse.unsw.edu.au>
@ 2003-05-26 4:25 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-26 4:29 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-26 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-05-26 04:16 -------
Hello,
would it be possible for you to check whether this problem is still present in gcc 3.3? Also, a
testcase of pre-processed source would be very much appreciated (makes it possible to reproduce
bugs on cross compilers without target headers). Thanks,
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
[not found] <20020904185600.7831.cvansch@cse.unsw.edu.au>
2003-05-26 4:25 ` [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-05-26 4:29 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-02 4:12 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-26 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-26 04:17 -------
See Dara's question.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
[not found] <20020904185600.7831.cvansch@cse.unsw.edu.au>
2003-05-26 4:25 ` [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-26 4:29 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-06-02 4:12 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-02 22:38 ` echristo@redhat.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-02 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |echristo@redhat.com
GCC build triplet| |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet| |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet| |mips64el-elf
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-02 04:12 -------
Eric,
sorry to bother you with yet another MIPS bug report. This one looks pretty straightforward
though. Any insights? Thanks,
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
[not found] <20020904185600.7831.cvansch@cse.unsw.edu.au>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-02 4:12 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-06-02 22:38 ` echristo@redhat.com
2003-06-03 10:25 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-22 9:27 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: echristo@redhat.com @ 2003-06-02 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
------- Additional Comments From echristo@redhat.com 2003-06-02 22:38 -------
Subject: Re: [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
>
> sorry to bother you with yet another MIPS bug report. This one looks pretty straightforward
> though. Any insights? Thanks,
I think we should suspend this one pending more info. There's nothing
that -EL should do that configuring for mipsel shouldn't. I think we
need the more information that was asked (a complete testcase would be
nice).
-eric
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
[not found] <20020904185600.7831.cvansch@cse.unsw.edu.au>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-02 22:38 ` echristo@redhat.com
@ 2003-06-03 10:25 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-22 9:27 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-03 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-03 10:25 -------
Still waiting for confirmation. Could the original submitter please try to
reproduce this with gcc 3.3, and if that fails, send a testcase?
Dara
(I think waiting is more appropriate than suspended, since that's what this
bug's doing right now...)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/7831] [mips] GCC 3.2 MIPS64 endian issues
[not found] <20020904185600.7831.cvansch@cse.unsw.edu.au>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-03 10:25 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-08-22 9:27 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-22 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-22 09:27 -------
No feedback in three months. Test case seems to be compiled correctly
by CVS head.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread