From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20885 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2003 04:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20867 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2003 04:29:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 04:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030602042926.20866.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia@physics.uc.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030109010600.9240.miles@gnu.org> References: <20030109010600.9240.miles@gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/9240] wierd scheduling on v850 unless -fno-sched-spec specified X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9240 pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-02 04:29:26 date| | ------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-06-02 04:29 ------- Acording to the submitter the problem is still there and looks like -fno-sched-spec fixes the problem. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.