From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16336 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2003 09:04:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16326 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2003 09:04:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 09:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030602090435.16322.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "erik.oosterom@chess.nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030326124600.10221.eoo@chess.nl> References: <20030326124600.10221.eoo@chess.nl> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/10221] gcc -O9 will introduce wrong asembler? X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10221 ------- Additional Comments From erik.oosterom@chess.nl 2003-06-02 09:04 ------- Subject: Re: gcc -O9 will introduce wrong asembler? Hi Dara, I shall try the snapshot 20030526, (but i do have not much time), does this include your changes? I understand that 09 is the same as 03, but the make script did use that. I let you know the results. Redgards, Erik ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.