[Bug bootstrap/10974] New: Bootstrap failure

[Bug bootstrap/10974] New: Bootstrap failure

[bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974

           Summary: Bootstrap failure
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com
                CC: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
 GCC build triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
  GCC host triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
GCC target triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0

/usr/vac/bin/cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I.
-I/opt/build/gcc-3.3/libiberty/../include
/opt/build/gcc-3.3/libiberty/physmem.c -o physmem.o
"/opt/build/gcc-3.3/libiberty/physmem.c", line 149.32: 1506-022 (S)
"physmem" is not a member of "struct {...}".
gmake[1]: *** [physmem.o] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/build/gcc-3.3-objdir/libiberty'

On AIX 5.1, the _system_configuration struct in <sys/systemcfg.h> does
have the physmem member:
        long long physmem;      /* bytes of OS available memory */

However, on 4.3.2, it doesn't exist (it exists on AIX 4.3.3 and above). And, I
don't see anything else in _system_configuration to get physical memory.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com  2003-05-25 15:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=4071)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4071&action=view)
Patch to correctly set HAVE__SYSTEM_CONFIGURATION if physmem member exists




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974


dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dje@watson.ibm.com





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-26 17:46 -------
David,

I believe this is you area of expertise. Would it be possible for you to take a look at the patch here 
and check whether this is a correct fix to the problem? Thanks,

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-05-26 18:04 -------
You should sent your patch to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, with a descripition of the bug.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dje@watson.ibm.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From dje@watson.ibm.com  2003-05-26 18:17 -------
Subject: Re: [Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure 

Kaveh,

	Would you plesae consider updating the libiberty physical memory
check on AIX with this patch?

David




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu  2003-06-01 13:56 -------
Subject: Re:  Bootstrap failure

 > From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
 > 
 > Kaveh,
 > 	Would you plesae consider updating the libiberty physical memory
 > check on AIX with this patch?
 > David

Sure.  Though I don't have any AIX boxes at all for testing it.  Can I
assume that you verified physmem is still correctly activated on
AIX4.3.3 and AIX5?

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dje@watson.ibm.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From dje@watson.ibm.com  2003-06-02 03:38 -------
Subject: Re:  Bootstrap failure 

>>>>> Kaveh R Ghazi writes:

Kaveh> Sure.  Though I don't have any AIX boxes at all for testing it.  Can I
Kaveh> assume that you verified physmem is still correctly activated on
Kaveh> AIX4.3.3 and AIX5?

	The patch tests for the existence of the structure member, not a
specific AIX version.  Why are you asking about AIX version numbers?

David




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu  2003-06-02 11:48 -------
Subject: Re:  Bootstrap failure

 > From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
 > 
 > >>>>> Kaveh R Ghazi writes:
 > 
 > Kaveh> Sure.  Though I don't have any AIX boxes at all for testing it.  Can I
 > Kaveh> assume that you verified physmem is still correctly activated on
 > Kaveh> AIX4.3.3 and AIX5?
 > 
 > 	The patch tests for the existence of the structure member, not a
 > specific AIX version.  Why are you asking about AIX version numbers?
 > David

I want to know if someone had tested the patch in both the negative
*and* the positive case of whether the structure member exists.  I
assume albert checked the negative case on his 4.3.2 box.  I listed
the AIX version numbers of where I thought the positive case lies.

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com  2003-06-02 11:52 -------
I tested on AIX 5.1 but not 4.3.3.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dje@watson.ibm.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From dje@watson.ibm.com  2003-06-02 18:16 -------
Subject: Re:  Bootstrap failure 

>>>>> ghazi@caip rutgers edu writes:

ghazi> I want to know if someone had tested the patch in both the negative
ghazi> *and* the positive case of whether the structure member exists.  I
ghazi> assume albert checked the negative case on his 4.3.2 box.  I listed
ghazi> the AIX version numbers of where I thought the positive case lies.

	The patch looks correct to me.  It tests assigning the structure
member to a double instead of a "long long", but that is what the function
in libiberty/physmem.c returns.

David





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-08 03:43 -------
Hello,

the patch for this doesn't yet seem to have been committed yet. Is the problem that nobody has 
tested it yet on AIX 4.3.3? Thanks,

Dara

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[dje@watson.ibm.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From dje@watson.ibm.com  2003-06-08 03:53 -------
Subject: Re:  Bootstrap failure 

>>>>> dhazeghi@yahoo com writes:

Dara> the patch for this doesn't yet seem to have been committed yet. Is the problem that nobody has 
Dara> tested it yet on AIX 4.3.3?

	I do not know why Kaveh has not merged the patch yet.

David

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu  2003-06-08 05:27 -------
Subject: Re:  Bootstrap failure

 > From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
 > 
 > >>>>> dhazeghi@yahoo com writes:
 > 
 > Dara> the patch for this doesn't yet seem to have been committed yet. Is the problem that nobody has 
 > Dara> tested it yet on AIX 4.3.3?
 > 
 > 	I do not know why Kaveh has not merged the patch yet.
 > David

For some reason, the followups to my question about testing didn't get
cc'ed to me directly.  So I never saw the replies until I checked the
PR audit trail just now.

I'm convinced by the replies, so I'll check in the patch tomorrow
(Sunday) on mainline and 3.3 branch.

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-06-09 03:19:41
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-06-09 03:19 -------
Waiting on Kaveh Ghazi to check it in.

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[cvs-commit@gcc.gnu.org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974



------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit@gcc.gnu.org  2003-06-09 05:20 -------
Subject: Bug 10974

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	ghazi@gcc.gnu.org	2003-06-09 05:20:02

Modified files:
	libiberty      : ChangeLog physmem.c configure.in config.in 
	                 configure 

Log message:
	PR bootstrap/10974
	* physmem.c: Update comment.
	* configure.in: Modify test for _system_configuration for older
	AIX systems.
	
	* config.in, configure: Regenerated.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libiberty/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.446&r2=1.447
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libiberty/physmem.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libiberty/configure.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.68&r2=1.69
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libiberty/config.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libiberty/configure.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.68&r2=1.69

[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure

[ghazi@gcc.gnu.org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974


ghazi@gcc.gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From ghazi@gcc.gnu.org  2003-06-09 05:41 -------
fix installed