public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/10965] New: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite
@ 2003-05-24 11:44 billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-24 14:04 ` [Bug fortran/10965] " billingd@gcc.gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: billingd@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-05-24 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10965
Summary: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: billingd@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: billingd@gcc.gnu.org
CC: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Steve Kargl reported a problem with 20000601-2.f. The test is one of mine. I
will check over my notes and come up with a fix.
I'm running the Fortran 77 code in gcc-testsuite-3.3.tar.bz2
through g95 and I've found that 20000601-2.f contains
illegal code for Fortran 95 and probably Fortran 77. I don't
have the Fortran 77 standard handy, but I believe the code is
illegal; yet g77 compiles the code without warning or error.
kargl[303] f77 -v -c 20000601-2.f
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.2 [FreeBSD] 20030205 (release)
kargl[305] f95 -V -fixed -dusty 20000601-2.f
NAGWare Fortran 95 compiler Release 4.2(468)
Copyright 1990-2002 The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd., Oxford, U.K.
f95comp version is 4.2(468)
Warning: 20000601-2.f, line 27: Unused symbol WORK31
detected at END@<end-of-statement>
Warning: 20000601-2.f, line 27: Unused symbol WORK13
detected at END@<end-of-statement>
[f95 continuing despite warning messages]
Obsolescent: 20000601-2.f, line 1: Fixed source form
Error: 20000601-2.f, line 21: Inconsistent argument data types to intrinsic MAX
kargl[318] ../../../../bin/g95 -ffixed-form -c -x f95 20000601-2.f
In file 20000601-2.f:21
JP = MAX( KM+1, AB( KV+1, JJ ) )
1
Error: 'a2' argument of 'max' intrinsic at (1) must be INTEGER(4)
--
Steve
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/10965] g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite
2003-05-24 11:44 [Bug fortran/10965] New: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite billingd@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-05-24 14:04 ` billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-27 0:36 ` david.billinghurst@riotinto.com
2003-06-03 0:15 ` billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: billingd@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-05-24 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10965
billingd@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-05-24 11:07:08
date| |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/10965] g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite
2003-05-24 11:44 [Bug fortran/10965] New: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-24 14:04 ` [Bug fortran/10965] " billingd@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-05-27 0:36 ` david.billinghurst@riotinto.com
2003-06-03 0:15 ` billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: david.billinghurst@riotinto.com @ 2003-05-27 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10965
------- Additional Comments From david.billinghurst@riotinto.com 2003-05-27 00:15 -------
Subject: [Bug fortran/10965] illegal code in testsuite - patch for testsuite
This patch removes the non-standard code in test g77.f-torture/compile/20000601-2.f.
I have looked over my notes on this. A function call was needed to trigger the bug, and
I used MAX(). Any other function call should be OK.
I tried to rebuild a mainline g77 from 20010118 to check this, but couldn't bootstrap.
I did build a version from 20010110, but the original and modified tests both
passed (although the bug was still present if I complied the LAPACK file sgbtrf.f).
2003-05-27 David Billinghurst (David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com)
PR fortran/10965
* g77.f-torture/compile/20000601-2.f: Fix non-standard code.
Index: 20000601-2.f
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g77.f-torture/compile/20000601-2.f,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 20000601-2.f
--- 20000601-2.f 19 Jan 2001 07:59:23 -0000 1.1
+++ 20000601-2.f 26 May 2003 23:55:53 -0000
@@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
INTEGER KL, KU, LDAB, M
REAL AB( LDAB, * )
- INTEGER J, JB, JJ, JP, KV, KM
+ INTEGER J, JB, JJ, JP, KV, KM, F
REAL WORK13(65,64), WORK31(65,64)
KV = KU + KL
DO J = 1, M
JB = MIN( 1, M-J+1 )
DO JJ = J, J + JB - 1
KM = MIN( KL, M-JJ )
- JP = MAX( KM+1, AB( KV+1, JJ ) )
+ JP = F( KM+1, AB( KV+1, JJ ) )
CALL SSWAP( JB, AB( KV+1+JJ-J, J ), LDAB-1,
$ AB( KV+JP+JJ-J, J ), LDAB-1 )
END DO
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/10965] g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite
2003-05-24 11:44 [Bug fortran/10965] New: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-24 14:04 ` [Bug fortran/10965] " billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-27 0:36 ` david.billinghurst@riotinto.com
@ 2003-06-03 0:15 ` billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: billingd@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-03 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10965
billingd@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From billingd@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-03 00:15 -------
Fixed in 3.4 by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg02225.html
This patch removes the non-standard code in test g77.f-torture/compile/20000601-
2.f. I have looked over my notes on this. A function call was needed to
trigger the bug, and I used MAX(). Any other function call should be OK.
I tried to rebuild a mainline g77 from 20010118 to check this, but couldn't
bootstrap. I did build a version from 20010110, but the original and modified
tests both passed (although the bug was still present if I complied the LAPACK
file sgbtrf.f). The test case was reduced from LAPACK so we will notice if the
problem comes back.
2003-05-27 David Billinghurst (David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com)
PR fortran/10965
* g77.f-torture/compile/20000601-2.f: Fix non-standard code.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-03 0:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-24 11:44 [Bug fortran/10965] New: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-24 14:04 ` [Bug fortran/10965] " billingd@gcc.gnu.org
2003-05-27 0:36 ` david.billinghurst@riotinto.com
2003-06-03 0:15 ` billingd@gcc.gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).