From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6979 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2003 04:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6893 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jun 2003 04:03:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 04:03:00 -0000 From: "pinskia@physics.uc.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <20030611040328.11149.pinskia@physics.uc.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11149] New: [3.3/3.4 Regression] ICE on error when instantiation with call function of a base type X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg01281.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11149 Summary: [3.3/3.4 Regression] ICE on error when instantiation with call function of a base type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: pinskia@physics.uc.edu CC: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org OtherBugsDependingO 11148 nThis: compile this code: template class Foo { int i; public: Foo() { X::explode(); } }; class Bar { Foo foo_; public: Bar() {} }; template class Foo; Since this is split, and I can confirm this on the mainline (20030610) and 3.3.1 (20030526) and I do not see the ICE. in 3.2.3