From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6549 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2003 15:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6527 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jun 2003 15:43:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030611154301.6526.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dhazeghi@yahoo.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030408161601.10350.jkanze@caicheuvreuse.com> References: <20030408161601.10350.jkanze@caicheuvreuse.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/10350] thread-safety problem in std::string. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg01318.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350 dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pcarlini@unitus.it ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-11 15:43 ------- Paolo, Ben suggested that I contact you about this bug report. Is this in fact a defect of libstdc++, or is this behavior intended? Thanks, Dara