public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "warrend@mdhost.cse.tek.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/10657] [3.3 regression] java section can not find libiconv Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:23:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030611232324.7199.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030507051600.10657.warren.dodge@tek.com> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10657 ------- Additional Comments From warrend@mdhost.cse.tek.com 2003-06-11 23:23 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] java section can not find libiconv As far as I know this was not fixed. I tried building gcc-3.3-20030508 and had the problem. I haven't touched it since then. I also submitted another enhancement request that would solve this problem. It was to allow us to specify a "library/include directory" which would be pushed down through the process of making gcc and become part of the "specs" file also. This would be similar to the libiconv switch but more general.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 23:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <20030507051600.10657.warren.dodge@tek.com> 2003-06-08 1:44 ` jsturm@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-11 22:47 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-06-11 23:23 ` warrend@mdhost.cse.tek.com [this message] 2003-07-12 3:19 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-13 16:17 ` jsturm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-24 20:40 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-24 20:41 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-19 23:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-20 0:20 ` warrend at mdhost dot cse dot tek dot com 2003-11-20 0:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-20 3:29 ` jsturm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-28 8:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-14 4:45 ` [Bug bootstrap/10657] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05 17:02 ` [Bug java/10657] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030611232324.7199.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).