From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7213 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2003 23:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7200 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2003 23:23:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030611232324.7199.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "warrend@mdhost.cse.tek.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030507051600.10657.warren.dodge@tek.com> References: <20030507051600.10657.warren.dodge@tek.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/10657] [3.3 regression] java section can not find libiconv X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg01414.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10657 ------- Additional Comments From warrend@mdhost.cse.tek.com 2003-06-11 23:23 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] java section can not find libiconv As far as I know this was not fixed. I tried building gcc-3.3-20030508 and had the problem. I haven't touched it since then. I also submitted another enhancement request that would solve this problem. It was to allow us to specify a "library/include directory" which would be pushed down through the process of making gcc and become part of the "specs" file also. This would be similar to the libiconv switch but more general.