public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
@ 2003-06-09 9:58 aj@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-09 13:24 ` [Bug target/11129] " pinskia@physics.uc.edu
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aj@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-09 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
Summary: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: jakub@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: aj@gcc.gnu.org
CC: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,jh@suse.cz
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
gromit:~/tmp:[1]$ /opt/gcc/3.4-devel/bin/gcc -fpreprocessed tls1.i -O2
tls1.i: In function `main':
tls1.i:64: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn:HI 19 362 20 1 0x40194580 (set (reg/f:SI 66)
(const:SI (plus:SI (unspec:SI [
(symbol_ref:SI ("local") [flags 0x22] <var_decl
0x40197a20 local>)
] 5)
(const_int 4 [0x4])))) -1 (nil)
(nil))
tls1.i:64: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2188
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
gromit:~/tmp:[1]$ /opt/gcc/3.4-devel/bin/gcc -fpreprocessed -v
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4-devel/lib/gcc-lib/i686-suse-linux-gnu/3.4/specs
Configured with: /cvs/gcc/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4-devel --disable-nls
--enable-threads=posix --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,ada,treelang,java,f77
--enable-checking=misc,tree,rtl,gc,rtlflag --with-system-zlib i686-suse-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4 20030604 (experimental)
Btw. the same appears with x86_64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-05/msg00940.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-09 13:24 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-09 13:31 ` jakub@gcc.gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-06-09 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-06-09 13:24 -------
If this is related to the test gcc.dg/tls/opt-6.c, then it has been failing since that test was
added which was 20030517.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-09 13:24 ` [Bug target/11129] " pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-06-09 13:31 ` jakub@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-10 4:30 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-09 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
------- Additional Comments From jakub@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-09 13:31 -------
Yes, but on the trunk only.
On gcc-3_3-branch, gcc-3_3-rhl-branch and gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch the test works
just fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-09 13:24 ` [Bug target/11129] " pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-09 13:31 ` jakub@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-10 4:30 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-10 4:53 ` rth@redhat.com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rth@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-10 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
rth@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|jakub@gcc.gnu.org |rth@gcc.gnu.org
------- Additional Comments From rth@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-10 04:30 -------
Probably my direct segment patch. I'll take a look.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-10 4:30 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-10 4:53 ` rth@redhat.com
2003-06-10 4:54 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rth@redhat.com @ 2003-06-10 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
------- Additional Comments From rth@redhat.com 2003-06-10 04:53 -------
Subject: Re: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
Appears to be a mismatch between two parts of the backend
checking similar things. Try this.
r~
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c,v
retrieving revision 1.574
diff -c -p -d -r1.574 i386.c
*** config/i386/i386.c 8 Jun 2003 14:50:14 -0000 1.574
--- config/i386/i386.c 10 Jun 2003 04:50:35 -0000
*************** legitimate_constant_p (x)
*** 5719,5725 ****
--- 5719,5728 ----
switch (XINT (inner, 1))
{
case UNSPEC_TPOFF:
+ case UNSPEC_NTPOFF:
return local_exec_symbolic_operand (XVECEXP (inner, 0, 0), Pmode);
+ case UNSPEC_DTPOFF:
+ return local_dynamic_symbolic_operand (XVECEXP (inner, 0, 0), Pmode);
default:
return false;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-10 4:53 ` rth@redhat.com
@ 2003-06-10 4:54 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-10 4:55 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rth@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-10 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
rth@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-10 04:54:10
date| |
------- Additional Comments From rth@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-10 04:54 -------
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-10 4:54 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-10 4:55 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-13 0:46 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-13 4:32 ` aj@gcc.gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rth@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-10 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
rth@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From rth@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-10 04:55 -------
Proposed patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-10 4:55 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-13 0:46 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-13 4:32 ` aj@gcc.gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rth@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-13 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
rth@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From rth@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-13 00:46 -------
Patch appears to work.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/11129] TLS broken on i686 and x86-64
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-13 0:46 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-13 4:32 ` aj@gcc.gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aj@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-13 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129
------- Additional Comments From aj@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-13 04:32 -------
Thanks, this patch works for me. Please commit it!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-13 4:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-09 9:58 [Bug target/11129] New: TLS broken on i686 and x86-64 aj@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-09 13:24 ` [Bug target/11129] " pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-09 13:31 ` jakub@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-10 4:30 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-10 4:53 ` rth@redhat.com
2003-06-10 4:54 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-10 4:55 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-13 0:46 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-13 4:32 ` aj@gcc.gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).