public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved
       [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
@ 2003-05-27  6:15 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-05-27 15:03 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-27  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-27 06:06 -------
Hello,

would it be possible for you to check whether gcc 3.3 does a better job? If not, if I send you the 
code for the examples produced by gcc 3.3 and mainline, can you confirm whether that code is 
better? Thanks,

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved
       [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
  2003-05-27  6:15 ` [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-05-27 15:03 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
  2003-06-13 11:05 ` herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-27 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-05-27 14:56 -------
See Dara's comment, also does -fomit-frame-pointer help?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved
       [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
  2003-05-27  6:15 ` [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-05-27 15:03 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-06-13 11:05 ` herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
  2003-06-13 23:40 ` [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables) pinskia@physics.uc.edu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au @ 2003-06-13 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901



------- Additional Comments From herbert@gondor.apana.org.au  2003-06-13 11:04 -------
Case 1 is fixed.

Case 2 is still present in gcc 3.3 and is identical as before.

Case 3 is gone as gcc 3.3 optimises it differently.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)
       [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-06-13 11:05 ` herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
@ 2003-06-13 23:40 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
  2003-12-17  0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-13 18:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/6901] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-06-13 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |9363
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-06-13 23:40 -------
Okay closing as fixed as bug 9363 is the bug for unused structs.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)
       [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-06-13 23:40 ` [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables) pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-12-17  0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-13 18:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/6901] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-17  0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 6901 depends on bug 9363, which changed state.

Bug 9363 Summary: unused struct literal constants remain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)
       [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-12-17  0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-13 18:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-13 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 6901 depends on bug 9363, which changed state.

Bug 9363 Summary: unused struct literal constants remain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-13 11:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20020601145600.6901.67206@bugs.debian.org>
2003-05-27  6:15 ` [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-27 15:03 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-13 11:05 ` herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
2003-06-13 23:40 ` [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables) pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-12-17  0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-13 18:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/6901] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).