From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29203 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2003 20:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29156 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2003 20:07:12 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030617200712.29155.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth@dealii.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020903013601.7817.backes@rhrk.uni-kl.de> References: <20020903013601.7817.backes@rhrk.uni-kl.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/7817] [3.3/3.4 regression] Link to gcc man page in g++ man page incorrect X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg01950.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7817 bangerth@dealii.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[3.3/3.4 regression][IRIX] |[3.3/3.4 regression] Link to |Link to gcc man page in g++ |gcc man page in g++ man page |man page incorrect |incorrect ------- Additional Comments From bangerth@dealii.org 2003-06-17 20:07 ------- The simplest solution would be just to copy the gcc man page onto the g++ man page, rather than playing tricks with links that might or might not work. In times of big disks this shouldn't be so much of a problem. Just for reference: the gcc.1 man page is 3821 bytes long on my system, so copying it would increase the size of a gcc installation by roughly 0.01%. W.