* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
@ 2003-06-08 19:04 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-19 19:53 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-06-08 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |3.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
2003-06-08 19:04 ` [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-06-19 19:53 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-06-19 20:34 ` pb at nexus dot co dot uk
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-06-19 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-19 19:42 -------
Philip,
has this patch been applied to the branch yet? If not, and particular reason why? Thanks,
Dara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
2003-06-08 19:04 ` [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-19 19:53 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-06-19 20:34 ` pb at nexus dot co dot uk
2003-06-20 15:52 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pb at nexus dot co dot uk @ 2003-06-19 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
------- Additional Comments From pb at nexus dot co dot uk 2003-06-19 20:33 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates
invalid asm
Richard had a concern that the patch might cause the compiler to blow up
post register elimination. It looks like a slightly different fix is
needed, and I haven't had time to work on that yet.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-19 20:34 ` pb at nexus dot co dot uk
@ 2003-06-20 15:52 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
2003-07-23 23:06 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at arm dot com @ 2003-06-20 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at arm dot com 2003-06-20 15:50 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates
invalid asm
Since I made that comment to you, I discovered EXTRA_ADDRESS_CONSTRAINT
while reading the gcc conference proceedings (see the paper on the s390
port). I think that is the best approach to this problem... I don't know
whether that will work on the branch though. Maybe the best solution is
to apply what you have to the branch, and to rework the trunk to use the
above.
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-20 15:52 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
@ 2003-07-23 23:06 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-16 17:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-23 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.3.1 |3.3.2
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-23 23:06 -------
ARM is not a primary evaluation platform.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-23 23:06 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-16 17:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-12 8:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-16 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.3.2 |3.3.3
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-16 17:02 -------
Postponed until GCC 3.3.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-16 17:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-12 8:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-21 19:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-12 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-12 08:24 -------
Philip, do you plan to backport the patch to the 3.3 branch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-12 8:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-21 19:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-29 18:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-21 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-21 18:53 -------
Philip, Richard --
Do you still believe the patch on mainline should be
backported to branch?
-- Gaby
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pb at gcc dot gnu dot org,
| |rearnsha at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-21 19:08 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-29 18:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-14 8:10 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-29 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-29 18:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-14 8:10 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-21 4:05 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-14 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-14 08:10 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Philip, Richard --
>
> Do you still believe the patch on mainline should be
> backported to branch?
No one cares?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-14 8:10 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-21 4:05 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-21 13:41 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-21 4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-21 04:05 -------
Nobody seems to care
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-21 4:05 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-21 13:41 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-21 14:03 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-01-21 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-01-21 13:41 -------
Has this been fixed for 3.4? If so, we should change the state
from WONTFIX to FIXED.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-21 13:41 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-01-21 14:03 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
2004-01-21 14:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at arm dot com @ 2004-01-21 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at arm dot com 2004-01-21 14:03 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates
invalid asm
>
> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-01-21 13:41 -------
> Has this been fixed for 3.4? If so, we should change the state
> from WONTFIX to FIXED.
>
I think it was fixed.
R.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-21 14:03 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
@ 2004-01-21 14:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-21 14:14 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-01-21 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-21 14:11 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Has this been fixed for 3.4?
Goog question. I judged from the title that it was a 3.3.x regression
only...
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-21 14:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2004-01-21 14:14 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-21 14:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-01-21 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-01-21 14:14 -------
>From comments #1, #3, #9, #14 I gather that it has been fixed on mainline.
I'll mark it as fixed, thus, and move the milestone.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Target Milestone|3.3.3 |3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-21 14:14 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-01-21 14:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-12 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-01-21 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-01-21 14:15 -------
Mark as FIXED.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-21 14:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-03-12 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-12 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-12 20:10 -------
Subject: Bug 10730
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-3_3-branch
Changes by: pb@gcc.gnu.org 2004-03-12 20:10:07
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/config/arm : arm.c
Log message:
2004-03-12 Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
PR target/10730
Backport from trunk:
2003-05-15 Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
* config/arm/arm.c (adjacent_mem_locations): Reject offsets
involving invalid constants.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.16114.2.932&r2=1.16114.2.933
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-branch&r1=1.243.2.5&r2=1.243.2.6
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm
[not found] <20030510114600.10730.192634@bugs.debian.org>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-12 20:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-12 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-12 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-12 20:19 -------
Fixed now for 3.3.4.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread