From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13295 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2003 14:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20738 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jun 2003 14:46:49 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030623144649.20737.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030623144544.11292.pinskia@physics.uc.edu> References: <20030623144544.11292.pinskia@physics.uc.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/11292] [3.4 Regression] -fnew-ra causes sibcalling to go wrong. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg02448.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11292 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-06-23 14:46 ------- I sent the wrong example (here is the right one where it does not sib call in main): char * mystrcpy(char *dest, char *source) { int len = strlen(source); return memmove(dest, source, len+1); } int main() { char temp[10]; char *t1="AA"; mystrcpy(temp, t1); return 0; }