public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
@ 2003-06-24 16:18 ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-06  1:43 ` [Bug c++/11309] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-06-24 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309

           Summary: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C
                    anew3.C anew4.c)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
  GCC host triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
GCC target triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5

The new tests, g++.dg/expr/anew[1-4].C added around 6/20, all fail on mips-sgi-
irix6.5 on the 3.3.1 branch and 3.4 mainline, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-06/msg01293.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-06/msg01292.html

The logfile doesn't say anything interesting, it's an execute failure.
In anew1.C, it bombs out on i=0, p[i]=21431296.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-06  1:43 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2003-07-19 17:23 ` dank at kegel dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-07-06  1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-06 01:43:32
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-06 01:43 -------
David Billinghurst gets the same results: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-06/
msg01839.html, so confirmed...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-06  1:43 ` [Bug c++/11309] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-07-19 17:23 ` dank at kegel dot com
  2003-07-19 17:28 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2003-07-19 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


dank at kegel dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dank at kegel dot com


------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com  2003-07-19 17:23 -------
I am seeing the same failure exactly in gcc-ss-20030714 with cross-compilers 
targeting powerpc and sh4, so it's not just mips.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-06  1:43 ` [Bug c++/11309] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2003-07-19 17:23 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2003-07-19 17:28 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-07-19 17:31 ` dank at kegel dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-19 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-19 17:28 -------
I think the problem is that the test(s) does not follow the standard of "The testsuite READMEs 
discuss the requirement to use abort () for runtime failures and exit (0) for success" but uses the 
exit values of 0 meaning success and 1 meaning error.
Looks like an easy patch for someone to do.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-19 17:28 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-19 17:31 ` dank at kegel dot com
  2003-07-28 18:37 ` echristo at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2003-07-19 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309



------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com  2003-07-19 17:31 -------
?  Maybe it reports the error in a non-approved way, but
this is a real problem; fixing how the error is reported
won't fix the fact that the variables aren't being initialized.

One other thing: the problem goes away if I link with -static.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-19 17:31 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2003-07-28 18:37 ` echristo at redhat dot com
  2003-08-16 12:06 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: echristo at redhat dot com @ 2003-07-28 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


echristo at redhat dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2003-07-06 01:43:32         |2003-07-28 18:37:01
               date|                            |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-28 18:37 ` echristo at redhat dot com
@ 2003-08-16 12:06 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-18  2:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-16 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-16 12:06 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-18  2:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-23  0:33 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-18  2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2003-07-28 18:37:01         |2003-08-18 02:16:14
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-18 02:16 -------
Note these failures do not happen on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 or i686-unknown-openbsd3.1.
But it does happen on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I do not know what is going wrong.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-18  2:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-23  0:33 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2004-01-03 13:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-03 15:08 ` dank at kegel dot com
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-08-23  0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4                         |---


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-23  0:33 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2004-01-03 13:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-03 15:08 ` dank at kegel dot com
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-03 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-03 13:27 -------
This is a dup of bug 2123.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2123 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11309] Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c)
  2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-01-03 13:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-03 15:08 ` dank at kegel dot com
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-01-03 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com  2004-01-03 15:07 -------
See also bug 11228

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-03 15:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-24 16:18 [Bug c++/11309] New: Testsuite failures in g++.dg/expr/anew1.C (and anew2.C anew3.C anew4.c) ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-06  1:43 ` [Bug c++/11309] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-07-19 17:23 ` dank at kegel dot com
2003-07-19 17:28 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-19 17:31 ` dank at kegel dot com
2003-07-28 18:37 ` echristo at redhat dot com
2003-08-16 12:06 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-18  2:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-23  0:33 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-01-03 13:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-03 15:08 ` dank at kegel dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).