public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 18:00:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030628180027.28113.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030628090748.11357.d.frey@gmx.de> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nathan at codesourcery dot | |com, giovannibajo at libero | |dot it ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-06-28 18:00 ------- Confirmed up to mainline, icc compiles this fine. I think the claim should be valid, though I must admit that I'm at a loss as to which conversion the compiler should choose. The existence of the specialization is irrelevant in this context, so the compiler could choose a conversion to float or double, for example. I'll leave this to other language lawyers. W.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-28 18:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-06-28 9:07 [Bug c++/11357] New: " d dot frey at gmx dot de 2003-06-28 18:00 ` bangerth at dealii dot org [this message] 2003-06-28 18:06 ` [Bug c++/11357] " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-06-30 0:07 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2003-07-01 7:45 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2003-07-01 7:52 ` daniel dot frey at aixigo dot de 2003-07-01 8:27 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2003-08-04 0:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-09-08 4:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-09 23:19 ` d dot frey at gmx dot de 2003-09-09 23:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-10 0:17 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-09-10 1:17 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-09-10 1:51 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-09-10 3:07 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-09-10 13:36 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-09-17 18:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-17 22:07 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-22 1:42 ` d dot frey at gmx dot de 2003-09-22 4:18 ` [Bug c++/11357] [DR 425?] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-26 22:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-30 4:31 ` [Bug c++/11357] [DR 425] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030628180027.28113.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).