From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12918 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2003 13:21:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12907 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2003 13:21:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 13:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030702132104.12906.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "erik dot oosterom at chess dot nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030326124600.10221.eoo@chess.nl> References: <20030326124600.10221.eoo@chess.nl> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/10221] gcc -O9 will introduce wrong asembler? X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10221 ------- Additional Comments From erik dot oosterom at chess dot nl 2003-07-02 13:21 ------- Subject: Re: gcc -O9 will introduce wrong asembler? Thanks to you but the bugs seems to be solved. :) The problem is a combination of P4 instructions and the -O3 flag.