From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23915 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2003 20:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23896 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jul 2003 20:23:39 -0000 Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 20:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030703202339.23893.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "toon at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> References: <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885 toon at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |toon at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From toon at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-03 20:23 ------- Created an attachment (id=4340) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4340&action=view) Proposed patch for this bug.