From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-62888-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27271 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2003 10:25:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27264 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2003 10:25:40 -0000
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 10:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030707102540.27263.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030701172459.11393.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20030701172459.11393.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11393] Initializer of static const float class member is not legal in c++98
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00674.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11393


rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-07 10:25 -------
It doesn't seem appropriate that this bug should be closed without comment from
one of the C++ front-end maintainers.