From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28451 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2003 19:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28437 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2003 19:07:10 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030707190710.28436.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com> References: <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00729.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865 ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot | |org | ------- Additional Comments From ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-07 19:07 ------- I have no further opinion on this matter (my position is that this is an inconsistency between ports not a bug with any one of them). It appears that the only way to move out of WAITING is to supply a patch to an HP maintainer or excite one to fix it. Please note that I'm not such a person.