[Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers

[Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-08 00:53 -------
Mark this a dup of bug 3713 which was for c++ but now for all languages.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***

[Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers

[doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079



------- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de  2003-07-08 04:50 -------
Subject: Re: Bug#173513:  Inline constant function pointers

pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu writes:
> Mark this a dup of bug 3713 which was for c++ but now for all languages.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***

I fail to see a resolution to this report. The call to funk is not
inlined.

[Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-08 10:46 -------
Subject: Re:  Inline constant function pointers

On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 00:50 US/Eastern, doko at cs dot tu-berlin 
dot de wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de  
> 2003-07-08 04:50 -------
> Subject: Re: Bug#173513:  Inline constant function pointers
>
> pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu writes:
>> Mark this a dup of bug 3713 which was for c++ but now for all 
>> languages.
>>
>> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***
>
> I fail to see a resolution to this report. The call to funk is not
> inlined.

This bug was the same bug as 3713 which means that they were the same 
bug.
Having two bugs referring to the same bug in the database is usually 
not good
because we cannot keep track of which bugs are important and which bugs 
or not
and we also cannot keep track of which bugs get fixed, that is why bugs 
are
marked as duplicates of each other.

I hope this bug gets fixed for the tree-ssa branch which makes working 
on the tree a
lot easier and the it can fold the constant function pointer and then 
maybe inline it.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

[Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-21 02:22 -------
Actually this is different than PR 3713.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-21 02:23 -------
And I have a patch which is for tree-ssa.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|REOPENED                    |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |pessimizes-code
            Summary|Inline constant function    |[tree-ssa] Inline constant
                   |pointers                    |function pointers
   Target Milestone|---                         |tree-ssa


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-21 02:25 -------
I should say that I have a partial fix for the tree-ssa, what needs to be done is inlining 
again.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-04-21 02:25:01
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-17 01:32 -------
Patch which also helps it the same way as my cast pass (which I am not going to submit 
at all).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-17 15:33 -------
The patch which helps is here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg00991.html>.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[cesarb at nitnet dot com dot br]

------- Additional Comments From cesarb at nitnet dot com dot br  2004-05-20 00:10 -------
I just hit this bug in a hairy piece of code which I reduced to the testcase
below (a should compile to the same thing as expected).

It's the same as this bug but with two layers of indirection instead of one.

#define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
#define regparm __attribute__((regparm(3)))
extern void regparm f(void);
static inline void regparm e(void)
{
	f();
}
static inline void regparm d(void)
{
	f();
}
static inline void regparm c(int x, void (regparm *p1)(void), void (regparm
*p2)(void))
{
	if (x)
		p1();
	else
		p2();
}
static inline void regparm b(int x, void (regparm *p)(int x, void (regparm
*p1)(void), void (regparm *p2)(void)))
{
	p(x, d, e);
}
void regparm a(int x)
{
	b(x, c);
}
void regparm expected(int x __attribute__((unused)))
{
	f();
}

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cesarb at nitnet dot com dot
                   |                            |br


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |org                         |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.5.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[sxanth at ceid dot upatras dot gr]

------- Additional Comments From sxanth at ceid dot upatras dot gr  2004-12-13 22:25 -------
This is present in 3.4 too

--------------------------------------------
static inline int foo ()
{
	return 100;
}

typedef int (*fptr)();

static const fptr a [] = { foo };

static inline int call (int i)
{
	return a [i]();
}

static inline int call2 (fptr f)
{
	return f();
}

static const fptr F = foo;

int main ()
{
	return call (0) + call2 (foo) + F() +foo();
}
---------------------------------------------------

Here only F() and foo() are added at compile time
but it would be better if gcc just returned 400 w/o any other code.

Please fix!


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-23 15:14 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-23 15:17 -------
Again this is different than PR 3713. (steven is closing bugs which are not really fixed or dups right 
now).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079

[Bug tree-optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079