From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-63135-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19311 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2003 14:23:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19302 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2003 14:23:35 -0000
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 14:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030709142335.19300.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030326124600.10221.eoo@chess.nl>
References: <20030326124600.10221.eoo@chess.nl>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/10221] gcc -O9 will introduce wrong asembler?
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00921.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10221


bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-07-09 14:23 -------
Bug seems to be fixed, and no feedback forthcoming otherwise.
W.