public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
@ 2003-07-10 20:34 orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  2003-07-10 20:51 ` [Bug c/11494] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il @ 2003-07-10 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494

           Summary: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

I tried to compile a program, and due to my mistake a constant in hexadecimal
had the value 712T, it cuased a segmentation fualt to the gcc.

gcc 3.3 20021024 (Suse Linux)

.c:49: internal compiler error: Segmentation fualt.

the C file:
#include <stdio.h>
#define CONST 0xF12T

unsigned int Sbox[256]=
{
 0x63, 124, 119, 123, 242, 107, 111, 197,  48,   1, 103,  43, 254, 215, 171,
118,
202, 130, 201, 125, 250,  89,  71, 240, 173, 212, 162, 175, 156, 164, 114,
192,
183, 253, 147,  38,  54,  63, 247, 204,  52, 165, 229, 241, 113, 216,  49,
21,
 0x4, 199,  35, 195,  24, 150,   5, 154,   7,  18, 128, 226, 235,  39, 178,
117,
 0x9, 131,  44,  26,  27, 110,  90, 160,  82,  59, 214, 179,  41, 227,  47,
132,
 83, 209, 0x0, 237, 0x20, 252, 177,  91, 106, 203, 190,  57,  74,  76,  88,
207,
208, 239, 170, 251,  67,  77,  51, 133,  69, 249,   2, 127,  80,  60, 159,
168,
 81, 163,  64, 143, 146, 157,  56, 245, 188, 182, 218,  33,  16, 255, 243,
210,
205,  12,  19, 236,  95, 151,  68,  23, 196, 167, 126,  61, 100,  93,  25,
115,
 96, 129,  79, 220,  34,  42, 144, 136,  70, 238, 184,  20, 222,  94,  11,
219,
224,  50,  58,  10,  73,   6,  36,  92, 194, 211, 172,  98, 145, 149, 228,
121,
231, 200,  55, 109, 141, 213,  78, 169, 108,  86, 244, 234, 101, 122, 174,
8,
186, 120,  37,  46,  28, 166, 180, 198, 232, 221, 116,  31,  75, 189, 139,
138,
112,  62, 181, 102,  72,   3, 246,  14,  97,  53,  87, 185, 134, 193,  29,
158,
225, 248, 152,  17, 105, 217, 142, 148, 155,  30, 135, 233, 206,  85,  40,
223,
140, 161, 137,  13, 191, 230,  66, 104,  65, 153,  45,  15, 176,  84, 187,
0x16
};

unsigned int invSB[256]={0};

int main() {
unsigned int i,k,j;

for (i=0;i<256;i++)
   invSB[Sbox[i]]=i;

for(i=0;i<256*256;i++) {
  j=((Sbox[i/256]<<8)||(Sbox[i&256]))^CONST;
  k=invSB[j/256]<<8||Sbox[j%256];
  printf("%x",i^k);
  }
return 0;
}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
  2003-07-10 20:34 [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
@ 2003-07-10 20:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-10 20:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-10 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494


steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-10 20:51 -------
This works in 3.4:
GNU C version 3.4 20030710 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4 20030710 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=47 --param ggc-min-heapsize=31916
11494.c:49:39: invalid suffix "T" on integer constant

What version of GCC were you using??


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
  2003-07-10 20:34 [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  2003-07-10 20:51 ` [Bug c/11494] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-10 20:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-10 20:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-10 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494


steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P1


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-10 20:54 -------
Never mind, I found it: gcc 3.3 20021024 (Suse Linux)

Does it still show with 3.3.1pre?  That would be a regression from 3.2.2 which
gives an error similar to the one from 3.4.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
  2003-07-10 20:34 [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  2003-07-10 20:51 ` [Bug c/11494] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-10 20:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-10 20:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-07-11 18:25 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  2003-07-11 18:26 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-10 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-10 20:59 -------
First the gcc which you are using is an old prerelease of gcc which comes from SUSE who is know 
to add patches so report it there.
Second, I cannot reproduce it on 3.3.1 (20030707), so it fixed already or was not busted in the 
FSF's version.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
  2003-07-10 20:34 [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-10 20:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-11 18:25 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  2003-07-11 18:26 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il @ 2003-07-11 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494



------- Additional Comments From orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il  2003-07-11 18:25 -------
Subject: Re:  invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal
 Segsigv

3.3. I think I put it in the report.
SuSE 8.1, gcc 3.3,

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
>
>
> steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-10 20:51 -------
> This works in 3.4:
> GNU C version 3.4 20030710 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>         compiled by GNU C version 3.4 20030710 (experimental).
> GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=47 --param ggc-min-heapsize=31916
> 11494.c:49:39: invalid suffix "T" on integer constant
>
> What version of GCC were you using??
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
  2003-07-10 20:34 [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-11 18:25 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
@ 2003-07-11 18:26 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il @ 2003-07-11 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494



------- Additional Comments From orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il  2003-07-11 18:26 -------
Subject: Re:  invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal
 Segsigv

Well, it actually says Experimental.



On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
>
>
> steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>            Priority|P2                          |P1
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-10 20:54 -------
> Never mind, I found it: gcc 3.3 20021024 (Suse Linux)
>
> Does it still show with 3.3.1pre?  That would be a regression from 3.2.2 which
> gives an error similar to the one from 3.4.
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
       [not found] <bug-11494-6489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2009-12-18  1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-18  1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-18  1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-18 01:24 -------
Close as a dup of bug 3885.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3885 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
       [not found] <bug-11494-6489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2009-12-18  1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-18  1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-18  1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-18 01:23 -------
Reopening to ...


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-18  1:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-10 20:34 [Bug c/11494] New: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
2003-07-10 20:51 ` [Bug c/11494] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-10 20:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-10 20:59 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-11 18:25 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
2003-07-11 18:26 ` orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il
     [not found] <bug-11494-6489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-12-18  1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-18  1:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).