From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4913 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2003 20:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4840 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2003 20:54:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 20:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030710205409.4834.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030710203416.11494.orrd-bugzilla@vipe.technion.ac.il> References: <20030710203416.11494.orrd-bugzilla@vipe.technion.ac.il> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01132.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 |P1 ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10 20:54 ------- Never mind, I found it: gcc 3.3 20021024 (Suse Linux) Does it still show with 3.3.1pre? That would be a regression from 3.2.2 which gives an error similar to the one from 3.4.