From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13964 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2003 20:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13950 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jul 2003 20:05:17 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 20:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030711200517.13949.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20010621130600.3347.h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> References: <20010621130600.3347.h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/3347] Too large bitfields should be errors X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01282.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3347 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |neil at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.8 | GCC host triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.8 | GCC target triplet|sparc-sun-solaris2.8 | Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-07-11 20:05:17 date| | ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-07-11 20:05 ------- Confirmed with current branch and mainline (20030710). Neil, I take it your patch was never applid?