From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-63501-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26273 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2003 20:44:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26264 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jul 2003 20:44:04 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 20:44:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030711204404.26263.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030711191311.11503.zlomek@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20030711191311.11503.zlomek@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11503] [3.3/3.4 Regression] segfault when instantiating template with ADDR_EXPR
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01287.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11503



------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-07-11 20:44 -------
I can't compress the testcase much more:
------------------------------
struct x {
    int foo () {}
};

template <class T>
struct vector {
    T& bar () {}
};

template <class T>
struct y {
    typedef struct {   
        x t;
    } s;
    
    vector<s> array;

    int foo ()
      { return array.bar().t.foo(); }
};
int i = y<x>().foo ();
------------------------------------
The most interesting observation is probably that if I replace the
  typedef struct {...} s;
stuff with simply
  struct s {...};
then the ICE goes away. So maybe it has to do with a bad interaction of
templates and anonymous struct.s

W.