From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-63781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6857 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2003 11:23:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6843 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2003 11:23:56 -0000
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030714112356.6842.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030714104225.11517.gdr@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20030714104225.11517.gdr@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11517] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ fails to properly convert pointer expressions in conditional expressions.
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01567.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11517


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
 GCC target triplet|native                      |*-*-*
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-14 11:23:55
               date|                            |
            Summary|g++ fails to properly       |[3.3/3.4 Regression]g++
                   |convert pointer expressions |fails to properly convert
                   |in conditional expressions. |pointer expressions in
                   |                            |conditional expressions.


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-14 11:23 -------
Here is a reduced sources:
struct Term { };
struct Boolean : Term {
   explicit Boolean(bool);
};
struct IsZero : Term {
   Term *eval();
};
Term*
IsZero::eval()
{
   return true ? new Boolean(false) : this;
}

I can confirm this fails on the mainline (20030714), 3.3.1 (20030707), 3.2.3, 3.0.4 but it does not 
fail on 2.95.3 making this a regression.