public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gsinai at yudit dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11518] New: (b==a && c==a && c!=b) == true
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030714123632.11518.gsinai@yudit.org> (raw)

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11518

           Summary: (b==a && c==a && c!=b) == true
           Product: gcc
           Version: 2.96 (redhat)
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: gsinai at yudit dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,gsinai at yudit dot org

(b==a && c==a && c!=b) 
Tths equation is somtimes true with redhat built gcc 2.6 on Pentiums.
a: double type
b: function call returning a double
c: method call returning a double

/*!
 * \file double.cpp
 * \brief If a==b and b==c then c==b? Not always. Not everywhere.
 * \author Gaspar Sinai <gsinai@yudit.org>
 * \date   2003-07-13.
 * Results:
 *--------------------------------------------------------------
 * Surprises
 *--------------------------------------------------------------
 * Pentium g++ 2.96:
 * setting: a_double: 0.1
 * setting: get_double(): 0.1
 * setting: a_Double.get(): 0.1
 * comparing: a_double == get_double()
 * comparing: a_double == a_Double.get()
 * comparing: a_Double.get() != get_double()
 *--------------------------------------------------------------
 * Pentium g++ 3.2.1:
 * setting: a_double: 0.1
 * setting: get_double(): 0.1
 * setting: a_Double.get(): 0.1
 * comparing: a_double != get_double()
 * comparing: a_double == a_Double.get()
 * comparing: a_Double.get() != get_double()
 *--------------------------------------------------------------
 * Expected
 *--------------------------------------------------------------
 * Alpha g++ 2.96:
 * setting: a_double: 0.1
 * setting: get_double(): 0.1
 * setting: a_Double.get(): 0.1
 * comparing: a_double == get_double()
 * comparing: a_double == a_Double.get()
 * comparing: a_Double.get() == get_double()
 *--------------------------------------------------------------

 * The interesting function:
 * static double
 * get_double(void)
 * {
 *   int i=1;
 *   // If you change i to 1 it will work everywhere. 
 *   return (double (i) / 10.0);
 * }
 */
#include  <iostream>

static double get_double(void);

class Double
{
public:
 double get(void);
 void set(double d);
protected:
 double m_d;
};

double
Double::get (void)
{
  return m_d;
}

void
Double::set (double d)
{
  m_d = d;
}

static double
get_double(void)
{
  int i=1;
  // If you change i to 1 it will work everywhere. 
  return (double (i) / 10.0);
}

int
main()
{
  double a_double = get_double();
  Double a_Double;
  a_Double.set (get_double());

  std::cout << "setting: a_double: " << a_double << std::endl;
  std::cout << "setting: get_double(): " << get_double() << std::endl;
  std::cout << "setting: a_Double.get(): " << a_Double.get() << std::endl;

  if (a_double == get_double())
  {
    std::cout << "comparing: a_double == get_double()" << std::endl;
  }
  if (a_double != get_double())
  {
    std::cout << "comparing: a_double != get_double()" << std::endl;
  }
  if (a_double == a_Double.get())
  {
    std::cout << "comparing: a_double == a_Double.get()" << std::endl;
  }
  if (a_double != a_Double.get())
  {
    std::cout << "comparing: a_double != a_Double.get()" << std::endl;
  }
  if (a_Double.get() == get_double())
  {
    std::cout << "comparing: a_Double.get() == get_double()" << std::endl;
  }
  if (a_Double.get() != get_double())
  {
    std::cout << "comparing: a_Double.get() != get_double()" << std::endl;
  }
  return (0);
}


             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 12:36 gsinai at yudit dot org [this message]
2003-07-14 12:45 ` [Bug c++/11518] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030714123632.11518.gsinai@yudit.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).