public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11517] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ fails to properly convert pointer expressions in conditional expressions.
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030714150923.9497.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030714104225.11517.gdr@gcc.gnu.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11517


bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-07-14 15:09 -------
I am not at all sure that the code is legal, and even less that it is
a regression. The standard says that the two operands shall have the same
type, or that one should be convertible to the other one. This is not
the case here, where both would have to be converted to pointer-to-base.

FWIW, icc doesn't accept the code either. Gaby, would you mind
explaining on which part of 5.16 you base your opinion?

W.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 10:42 [Bug c++/11517] New: g++ " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-14 10:44 ` [Bug c++/11517] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-14 11:23 ` [Bug c++/11517] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-14 11:31 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-14 12:22 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-07-14 15:09 ` bangerth at dealii dot org [this message]
2003-07-14 15:42 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-07-14 15:51 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-23 14:39 ` [Bug c++/11517] [3.4 " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-23 15:37 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-23 18:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-23 18:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030714150923.9497.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).