public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11517] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ fails to properly convert pointer expressions in conditional expressions.
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030714154245.21267.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030714104225.11517.gdr@gcc.gnu.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11517



------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2003-07-14 15:42 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ fails to properly convert pointer expressions in conditional expressions.

"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| I am not at all sure that the code is legal, and even less that it is
| a regression. The standard says that the two operands shall have the same
| type, or that one should be convertible to the other one. This is not
| the case here, where both would have to be converted to pointer-to-base.
| 
| FWIW, icc doesn't accept the code either. Gaby, would you mind
| explaining on which part of 5.16 you base your opinion?

It is quite simple: I was presented with different behaviour of
GCC-2.95.x and GCC-3.3.1 on something which intuitively appeared clear
to me.  I was under the impression that "composite pointer type" can
also brings to common base class.  It appears not.  Sorry for the
confusion. 

-- Gaby


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 10:42 [Bug c++/11517] New: g++ " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-14 10:44 ` [Bug c++/11517] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-14 11:23 ` [Bug c++/11517] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-14 11:31 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-14 12:22 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-07-14 15:09 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-14 15:42 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net [this message]
2003-07-14 15:51 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-23 14:39 ` [Bug c++/11517] [3.4 " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-23 15:37 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-23 18:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-23 18:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030714154245.21267.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).