From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26456 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2003 13:35:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26445 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jul 2003 13:35:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030715133547.26444.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030701163802.11392.ilgis@num.uni-sb.de> References: <20030701163802.11392.ilgis@num.uni-sb.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/11392] [3.3/3.4 Regression]More trouble with nested functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01681.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11392 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-15 13:35 ------- Acording to Phil's regression hunter, this has been failing since at least 2000-12-31 (the gcc earliest he has) so something before that makes this code ICE.