public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/7385] g++ problems with enum and __attribute__
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030717070300.26279.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020723051601.7385.gusti@pallas.dk>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7385



------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2003-07-17 07:02 -------
Subject: Re:  g++ problems with enum and __attribute__

On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 19:53, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7385
> 
> 
> pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |pinskia at physics dot uc
>                    |                            |dot edu
>    Last reconfirmed|2003-07-14 04:06:26         |2003-07-17 02:53:28
>                date|                            |
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-17 02:53 -------
> Mark are you still working on a fix?

No, I gave up.

It is probably relatively more tractable in the new paser, but even
there it is probably not easy.  I'm not sure what the new attribute
syntax document says about this case.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-17  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020723051601.7385.gusti@pallas.dk>
2003-07-17  2:53 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-17  7:03 ` mark at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2003-07-17 12:48 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-22 18:29 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-29 18:00 ` [Bug c++/7385] [3.3/3.4 Regression] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-05 20:25 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
2003-08-09  2:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-29 20:40 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-29 20:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030717070300.26279.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).