From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26300 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 07:03:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26280 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 07:03:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030717070300.26279.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020723051601.7385.gusti@pallas.dk> References: <20020723051601.7385.gusti@pallas.dk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/7385] g++ problems with enum and __attribute__ X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01900.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7385 ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2003-07-17 07:02 ------- Subject: Re: g++ problems with enum and __attribute__ On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 19:53, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu wrote: > PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7385 > > > pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |pinskia at physics dot uc > | |dot edu > Last reconfirmed|2003-07-14 04:06:26 |2003-07-17 02:53:28 > date| | > > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-17 02:53 ------- > Mark are you still working on a fix? No, I gave up. It is probably relatively more tractable in the new paser, but even there it is probably not easy. I'm not sure what the new attribute syntax document says about this case.