From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-64131-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26099 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 11:22:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26092 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jul 2003 11:22:43 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:22:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030717112243.26091.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20021207074600.8859.mlt@bredband.net>
References: <20021207074600.8859.mlt@bredband.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/8859] [CygWin] Initializer element allegedly not constant
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01917.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8859


giovannibajo at libero dot it changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2003-07-17 11:22 -------
Not a bug, as explained by Danny. And it does emit a correct error message in 
all open branches. Thanks Danny for your patches!