public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11613] attribute unused after label causes error with g++
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030721143325.812.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030721100002.11613.jsaw@gmx.net>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11613


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-21 14:33:25
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-21 14:33 -------
>From <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html>:
An attribute specifier list may appear __after__ the __colon__ following a label, other than a case or 
default label.  The only attribute it makes sense to use after a label is unused.  This feature is 
intended for code generated by programs which contains labels that may be unused but which is 
compiled with -Wall.  It would not normally be appropriate to use in it human-written code, 
though it could be useful in cases where the code that jumps to the label is contained within an 
#ifdef conditional.

Also from that page:
Because of infelicities in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here may not be 
successfully parsed in all cases
I do not know if this should be acceptable in c++.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-21 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-21 10:00 [Bug c++/11613] New: " jsaw at gmx dot net
2003-07-21 14:27 ` [Bug c++/11613] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-21 14:33 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu [this message]
2003-07-21 15:01 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-23 17:17 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-23 17:23 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-25 10:54 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-24 17:04 ` msp at nortelnetworks dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030721143325.812.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).