From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25646 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2003 21:55:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25630 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jul 2003 21:55:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030722215534.25628.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030722205341.11633.msimons@simons-clan.com> References: <20030722205341.11633.msimons@simons-clan.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11633] g++ does not initialize structures when auto-increment variables are used X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg02646.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11633 bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nathan at codesourcery dot | |com ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-07-22 21:55 ------- Hm, 8.5.1 is the normative part of the standard, but it doesn't say anything about the order of evaluation. Nathan, language lawyers to the front? W.