public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11633] g++ does not initialize structures when auto-increment variables are used
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030723090416.4284.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030722205341.11633.msimons@simons-clan.com>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11633



------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-23 09:04 -------
I beleive the code to be ill formed. Looking at 8.5.1 of the std does not
help. brace enclosed initializer lists can only be used for aggregates. 1.9
talks about sequence points and full-expression. The initializers in an
initializer list are not full-expressions, because they'r part of the initializer.

AFAICT, The comma symbol is only a sequence point when it is the comma-operator
(and does not resolve to an overloaded function!)

I suspect when designtated initializers are used in different C99 compilers,
you'll find the behaviour is not the same across all compilers.

The Defect list does not talk about this case, I will ask the committee.
I would be surprised if the intent is to be anything different from
C90/C99.

nathan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-23  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-22 20:53 [Bug c++/11633] New: " msimons at simons-clan dot com
2003-07-22 20:55 ` [Bug c++/11633] " msimons at simons-clan dot com
2003-07-22 21:41 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-22 21:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-22 22:10 ` msimons at simons-clan dot com
2003-07-22 23:19 ` msimons at simons-clan dot com
2003-07-22 23:36 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-23  1:09 ` msimons at simons-clan dot com
2003-07-23  9:04 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2003-08-23 17:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-21 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-21 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-30  1:47 ` [Bug c++/11633] [DR 430] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-30 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030723090416.4284.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).