From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25031 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2003 19:54:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25015 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jul 2003 19:54:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030723195400.25014.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030618005403.11231.eranian@hpl.hp.com> References: <20030618005403.11231.eranian@hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/11231] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined array size inside struct cause segfault with -g X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg02750.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11231 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-23 19:53 ------- >>From Phil's regression hunter: : Test is the same (fail) at both endpoints (2000-12-31-trunk, : 2003-07-22-trunk), so there's nothing for me to do. So the change to cause this happened before 2000-12-31.