From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13695 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2003 23:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13669 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jul 2003 23:18:27 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030723231827.13668.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "janis187 at us dot ibm dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030721164104.11617.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030721164104.11617.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11617] [3.4 regression] g++ does not report missing member functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg02792.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11617 janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org ------- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-07-23 23:18 ------- The regression in PR 11617 was introduced or exposed by this patch: --- gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog --- 2003-07-14 Mark Mitchell PR c++/7019 * cp-tree.h (lookup_qualified_name): Adjust prototype. * decl.c (lookup_qualified_name): Add complain parameter. Adjust call to is_aggr_type. * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Adjust call to lookup_qualified_name. * pt.c (tsubst_qualified_id): Likewise. (tsubst_copy_and_build): Likewise. * semantics.c (finish_qualified_id_expr): Deal with erroneous expressions. The regression hunt took place on i686-pc-linux-gnu and used the small test case from Comment #2.