public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gccbugs at contacts dot eelis dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11786] New: operator() call on variable in other namespace not recognized
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 06:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030804063201.11786.gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net> (raw)

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11786

           Summary: operator() call on variable in other namespace not
                    recognized
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: gccbugs at contacts dot eelis dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

GCC rejects the following valid code:

  struct S
  {
    template <typename T> void operator() (T) {}
  };

  namespace N
  {
    S s;
    struct A {} a;
  }

  using N::s;

  void f () { s(N::a); }

GCC says:

  t.cpp:8: error: `N::s' is not a function,
  t.cpp:8: error:   conflict with `N::s'
  t.cpp:14: error:   in call to `s'

My best guess would be that GCC does not recognize s(..) as a call to operator()
on _variable_ N::s, and as such insists on finding a _function_ named 'N::s'. I
haven't got a clue as to what the rest of the error message indicates or how A
is involved.

Comeau compiles the code without problems.

I'm using GCC 3.4 20030723.


             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-04  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-04  6:32 gccbugs at contacts dot eelis dot net [this message]
2003-08-04  7:28 ` [Bug c++/11786] " gccbugs at contacts dot eelis dot net
2003-08-04 19:46 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-04 23:02 ` [Bug c++/11786] [3.3/3.4 regression] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-08 18:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-08 19:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-08 19:15 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030804063201.11786.gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).